Biada literaturze, która nie budzi namiętności.
Literatura musi wzbudzać głębokie emocje i intelektualne zaangażowanie, by spełniać swoją transformującą, empatyczną i egzystencjalną rolę.
A Psychological-Philosophical Exploration of Żeleński-Boy's 'Woe to the literature that does not arouse passion.'
Tadeusz Żeleński-Boy's poignant aphorism, 'Biada literaturze, która nie budzi namiętności,' resonates deeply within the intertwined realms of psychology and philosophy, offering profound insights into the very purpose and impact of art, particularly literature. At its core, the statement critiques a form of artistic expression that fails to connect with the human spirit on an emotional and existential level. From a psychological perspective, this 'passion' can be understood as the activation of deep-seated emotions, cognitive engagement, and the stirring of the unconscious.
Literature, when truly effective, transcends mere information transfer; it becomes a catalyst for empathic understanding. By presenting characters, narratives, and ideas, it invites the reader to inhabit other perspectives, to feel joy, sorrow, anger, or love alongside fictional beings. This process of emotional simulation is crucial for psychological development and social bonding. When literature fails to elicit such a passionate response, it becomes intellectually sterile, incapable of fostering introspection or challenging established norms. It risks becoming a superficial exercise, devoid of the power to transform or inspire.
W świecie, który każe Ci być kimś, odważ się być sobą.
Radykalna samoakceptacja to zaproszenie do wewnętrznej wolności.
Zobacz, czym jest i jak wiele może Ci dać!
Philosophically, the quote touches upon the existential significance of art. If art's role is to illuminate the human condition, to explore fundamental questions of meaning, purpose, and morality, then without passion, it becomes inert. Passion, in this context, is not merely fleeting excitement but a profound emotional and intellectual engagement that compels the individual to reflect, to question, and perhaps even to act. A literature devoid of passion is a literature that has relinquished its ethical and ontological responsibility. It fails to tap into the human need for transcendence, for experiences that move beyond the mundane and connect us to something larger than ourselves. Żeleński-Boy is essentially arguing that art’s power lies in its ability to animate the soul, to ignite the inner life, and to provoke a meaningful response that resonates long after the final page is turned.